Geoengineering, Explained: Reflecting Sunlight vs. Removing Carbon

Geoengineering involves deliberate, large-scale climate interventions, broadly categorized into Solar Radiation Management (SRM) to reflect sunlight and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) to extract atmospheric CO2. Both approaches carry distinct mechanisms, risks, and governance challenges, and neither replaces the necessity of emissions cuts.

David Grossman

October 26, 2026 · 5 min read

Geoengineering is the deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to temper the harms of greenhouse gas emissions, and it splits into two fundamentally different families of approaches. One, Solar Radiation Management (SRM), works by reflecting a portion of sunlight back to space to cool the planet. The other, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), works by pulling carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency frames this distinction as the organizing structure of the field, and it matters because the two categories carry entirely different mechanisms, timescales, and risks.

What is Geoengineering?

According to the EPA, geoengineering encompasses both the removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and the intentional modification of sunlight reaching Earth's surface. The Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics describes the underlying idea as deliberate manipulation of physical, chemical, or biological aspects of the Earth system with the intention of tempering the harmful effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.

The two categories differ in a basic way. SRM-type interventions treat a symptom—excess heat—by deflecting sunlight before it is absorbed, while CDR addresses the cause by reducing the concentration of CO2 already in the air. Yale economist Kelly Shue, writing about climate intervention, notes that geoengineering is being discussed as one potential way to keep the harms of climate change at bay as the world moves toward surpassing the 1.5 degrees Celsius threshold above preindustrial averages. The Union of Concerned Scientists adds that researchers are examining solar geoengineering precisely because emissions cuts alone may not be enough to avoid substantial climate disruption.

Solar Radiation Management (SRM): Reflecting Sunlight

Solar Radiation Management aims to bring down temperatures by reflecting a small amount of sunlight back into space, limiting what reaches the Earth's surface. The EPA explains that most proposed techniques involve adding material to the atmosphere to increase the amount of incoming sunlight reflected away.

The most widely studied method is Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), which introduces sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the atmosphere to temporarily cool the planet. Although SRM has never been deployed, it mimics a natural process: the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo is believed to have cooled the planet by roughly 0.5 degrees Celsius over the following two years because of the sulfur dioxide it released. The Union of Concerned Scientists identifies SAI and marine cloud brightening as the two main approaches being researched, and the organization opposes deployment because it poses what it calls unacceptably high environmental, social, and geopolitical risks.

Other techniques, such as cirrus cloud thinning and space-based methods, have been far less researched, the EPA notes, due to uncertainty in the processes, high potential costs, and more limited feasibility.

Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Taking CO2 Out of the Atmosphere

Carbon Dioxide Removal focuses on actively extracting CO2 from the atmosphere. The EPA lists direct air capture and storage, ocean iron fertilization, and ocean alkalinity enhancement among the proposed methods. A report by Mohammed Al-Juaied and Adam Whitmore at Harvard's Belfer Center emphasizes that meeting international climate goals will likely require CDR as part of a wider program of action—but that the main priority must be reducing and eliminating emissions, since preventing greenhouse gases from entering the atmosphere is usually easier and less costly than removing them once there.

Direct Air Capture (DAC) operates on the principle of extracting atmospheric carbon dioxide to reuse it in other industries or sequester it underground, as described in a review of DAC technology published in the National Library of Medicine's repository. Commercial projects from companies such as Climeworks and Carbon Engineering rely on large fans to intake air before capture and storage.

However, the Grantham Research Institute cautions that achieving CDR at a scale that would substantially contribute to mitigating climate change is a massive undertaking, and that the methods carry multiple negative side effects. Ocean fertilization, for instance, may have unwanted effects on ocean ecology, while biomass-based approaches would compete for land needed for food crops and nature conservation.

Geoengineering Methods: A Comparative Overview

The table below categorizes the most commonly discussed techniques under their primary approach and compares how each works against its most significant known risk or uncertainty. The central distinction it delivers: SRM methods reflect sunlight to cool the planet without addressing atmospheric CO2, while CDR methods remove CO2 itself, each carrying distinct and unresolved risks.

Comparison of major geoengineering methods by category, mechanism, and primary risk
Category	Method	Mechanism	Primary Risk / Uncertainty
Solar Radiation Management (SRM)	Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI)	Introduces sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the stratosphere to cool the planet, mimicking volcanic processes such as Pinatubo in 1991	Potential unintended health and environmental consequences; uncertain local impacts; significant governance challenges including possible unilateral action
Solar Radiation Management (SRM)	Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB)	Adds material to the atmosphere to increase sunlight reflected back to space	Poses environmental, social, and geopolitical risks, per the Union of Concerned Scientists, which opposes deployment
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)	Direct Air Capture (DAC)	Extracts atmospheric CO2 for reuse in industry or for underground sequestration	Requires massive scale-up to matter; costs are a significant consideration; rated at a low Technological Readiness Level
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)	Ocean Iron Fertilization	Adds iron to stimulate phytoplankton growth that absorbs CO2	May have unwanted side effects on ocean ecology; full ecological impacts not understood

Comparison of major geoengineering methods by category, mechanism, and primary risk

Geoengineering, Explained: Reflecting Sunlight vs. Removing Carbon

What is Geoengineering?

Solar Radiation Management (SRM): Reflecting Sunlight

Tags

Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Taking CO2 Out of the Atmosphere

Geoengineering Methods: A Comparative Overview

Cross-Cutting Risks, Uncertainties, and Governance Challenges

Navigating the Future of Climate Intervention

Sources

Related articles

Three Ways Plates Meet: How Convergent, Divergent, and Transform Boundaries Shape the Earth

A 700,000-Year-Old Elephant Tooth Reveals the Lost Landscape That Sustained Early Humans in the Levant

Teghaza 001: 4.1-Billion-Year-Old Martian Meteorite Reveals a Wetter, Earth-Like Early Mars

Stakes, Satellites, or SAR? How to Choose the Right Way to Watch a Glacier Move